airbox/ no airbox

Please share your secrets! What mods have you made to your TRX?

Moderators: trixynut, Mincehead, dicky, phuk72, Jak, Kevtrx849

alextrx850
Site Sponsor
Posts: 2149
Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2011 10:36 pm
Location: brisbane AUSTRALIA

Re: airbox/ no airbox

Post by alextrx850 » Sun Nov 04, 2012 12:28 am

:laughing6: :laughing6: ..Prob no need for filter oil Coxy,..the toe jam will grab the dust from those footy sox.

With my inlet snorkle and factory filter removed, the full throttle induction sound from the box is adictive.!

coxylaad
Site Sponsor
Posts: 1210
Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2011 12:30 am

Re: airbox/ no airbox

Post by coxylaad » Sun Nov 04, 2012 12:30 am

I am going to make a sort of half airbox for it, and fit the ramair filter around the velocity stacks from the 900 airbox.

actually a point on that, the velocy stacks on the tdm900 airbox are completely different lengths - one is twice the length of the other!

I have just bought a 900 airbox off ebay so I can have 2 stacks the same length. dunno whats going on there.

User avatar
fung
Site Sponsor
Posts: 1605
Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2010 2:00 am
Location: Gold Coast. South East Queensland.

Re: airbox/ no airbox

Post by fung » Sun Nov 04, 2012 2:20 am

if i remember correctly, killer is using carbs and stacks on his TRX900.
different height stacks may give both throats equal opportunity to suck air ?
maybe the shape of the box ?
or the efi and 270 crank fire combo with a common airbox ?
cheers
fung
:rr:
I WOULD RATHER WEAR OUT THAN RUST

User avatar
Mincehead
TRX-Enthusiast
Posts: 6345
Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2009 1:40 pm
Location: West Sussex

Re: airbox/ no airbox

Post by Mincehead » Sun Nov 04, 2012 10:40 am

coxylaad wrote:I am going to make a sort of half airbox for it, and fit the ramair filter around the velocity stacks from the 900 airbox.

actually a point on that, the velocy stacks on the tdm900 airbox are completely different lengths - one is twice the length of the other!

I have just bought a 900 airbox off ebay so I can have 2 stacks the same length. dunno whats going on there.

Typically, shorter stacks produce better high RPM BHP and longer ones at lower RPM. This pretty much holds true on header length as well. Yamaha likely found a compromise during engine testing / dyno results by using two stacks of different lengths. :wink:
LOUD PIPES SAVE LIVES

User avatar
dandywarhol
Site Sponsor
Posts: 1639
Joined: Fri Nov 24, 2006 12:56 pm
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland

Re: airbox/ no airbox

Post by dandywarhol » Sun Nov 04, 2012 11:04 am

Remember also the 900 has a 2 stage intake valve controlled by the ecu and vacuum
different ideas as to what its for but noise emissions and improved low rpm response seem to be favourites.
I'll dig out info from the Yamaha Technical Bulletin tonight.
1996 TRX 850, blue, Ohlins 46HRCLS, Race Tech Gold Valves, 0.90 springs, Venom pipes, R6 brakes............
1974 Yamaha RD250A, Candy Blue
1998 Yamaha SZR660, blue of course
1967 Yamaha TD1C 250, Blue and white

coxylaad
Site Sponsor
Posts: 1210
Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2011 12:30 am

Re: airbox/ no airbox

Post by coxylaad » Mon Nov 05, 2012 12:27 am

interesting information, however its all going in the bin.

going to use the shorter pair of stacks into a home brew hybrid airbox. will report back.

User avatar
GARAGE HERMIT
TRX-Enthusiast
Posts: 3
Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2013 11:35 am
Location: england

Re: airbox/ no airbox

Post by GARAGE HERMIT » Sat Dec 21, 2013 7:27 pm

dandywarhol wrote:An engine with carbs/cylinders side by side will blow back fuel into the airbox when the inlet valve snaps shut whether it is a CV of slide carb. The 900 injector is basically an electronic carb, although it does inject nearer to the valves than a carb but the fuel mix will still blowback. The blowback aids lower end performance with an airbox because the adjacent cylinder will suck the fuel in along with the air - with individual pods the blowback is lost to atmosphere (that's why the underside of the tank/frame/your legs etc. get a bit petrol smelly.)
funny thing is this infamous blow-back never happened with all the triumph/norton twins i've owned and a little kaw 400 twin i had with pod filter's on, internet urban myth, ??

User avatar
dandywarhol
Site Sponsor
Posts: 1639
Joined: Fri Nov 24, 2006 12:56 pm
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland

Re: airbox/ no airbox

Post by dandywarhol » Sat Dec 21, 2013 7:35 pm

Welcome GH - all input is appreciated on here. :D

I'd need to see the valve timing diagrams of the Brit bikes and the Kawa to comment. Having raced an 8 valve Rickman head Triumph sidecar outfit many moons ago, I can personally account for the fuel blowback stinging my neck and face at the end of a race! 8)
1996 TRX 850, blue, Ohlins 46HRCLS, Race Tech Gold Valves, 0.90 springs, Venom pipes, R6 brakes............
1974 Yamaha RD250A, Candy Blue
1998 Yamaha SZR660, blue of course
1967 Yamaha TD1C 250, Blue and white

User avatar
GARAGE HERMIT
TRX-Enthusiast
Posts: 3
Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2013 11:35 am
Location: england

Re: airbox/ no airbox

Post by GARAGE HERMIT » Sat Dec 21, 2013 7:50 pm

so you're thinking it's the valve timing overlap causing this blow back,?

User avatar
dandywarhol
Site Sponsor
Posts: 1639
Joined: Fri Nov 24, 2006 12:56 pm
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland

Re: airbox/ no airbox

Post by dandywarhol » Sat Dec 21, 2013 8:32 pm

I think it's a combination of things, including valve overlap and the shock/pressure wave produced when the valves snap shut. I think valve timing because it appears to be worse at low/mid rev range when large overlap is counterproductive to producing power - and why variable valve timing and multi-air design on modern(ish) engine design is less of a compromise.

It would be interesting to find out if VVT produces less blowback..................... :?

Looks like you've got a long stroke method in your avatar GH :lol:
1996 TRX 850, blue, Ohlins 46HRCLS, Race Tech Gold Valves, 0.90 springs, Venom pipes, R6 brakes............
1974 Yamaha RD250A, Candy Blue
1998 Yamaha SZR660, blue of course
1967 Yamaha TD1C 250, Blue and white

User avatar
GARAGE HERMIT
TRX-Enthusiast
Posts: 3
Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2013 11:35 am
Location: england

Re: airbox/ no airbox

Post by GARAGE HERMIT » Sat Dec 21, 2013 9:26 pm

not trying to be clever, but if it was a case of the shock/pressure wave from the inlet valve closing, every bike would be blowing petrol mist out of the carb's, single's, four's, etc, that had pod filter's fitted,
with the std air-box fitted the thinking is that the blow-back from one carb is sucked back into the engine by the other carb, surely this would'nt suck all the petrol mist out of the airbox and you would get condensed petrol puddling in the bottom of the airbox,
i'm after a definitive answer to this pod filter's versus std airbox as i'm going to make a frame, and dont want to end up having to re-do it if i use the pod filter's and it does in fact cover me in petrol,
any pod filter user's out there, let me know,

alextrx850
Site Sponsor
Posts: 2149
Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2011 10:36 pm
Location: brisbane AUSTRALIA

Re: airbox/ no airbox

Post by alextrx850 » Sun Dec 22, 2013 12:27 am

Using the Ram Air filter over the blue inlets to my FCR41s ..doesn't cough back at all,
I've heard about the supposed problem to a fuel fire in the pods, and am wary of it, but my machine runs in good tune.

Is your avatar a selfie.... :shock: :wink:

coxylaad
Site Sponsor
Posts: 1210
Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2011 12:30 am

Re: airbox/ no airbox

Post by coxylaad » Sun Dec 22, 2013 1:11 am

just to add to this.

I am running a sock filter bridged over the two trumpets, with no airbox at all. No running problems and no smell of fuel anywhere around the bike either.
This is tdm900 setup with throttle bodies and fuel injection.

However I am currently doing up an TRX tuned ex race bike, running hot cams and FCRs, that hasnt been fired up for year and it still stinks of petrol around the inlet area!

maybes its a carb problem?

Post Reply