TRXs mentioned in UK bike magazine "TWO"...

General Discussion Forum for TRX Enthusiasts...

Moderators: trixynut, Mincehead, dicky, phuk72, Jak, Kevtrx849

User avatar
CULater
TRX-Enthusiast
Posts: 119
Joined: Mon Sep 25, 2006 12:05 am
Location: Ameide Holland
Contact:

Post by CULater » Sat Dec 09, 2006 4:48 pm

Perhaps if Yamaha would let go of the 5 valve configuration and go back to 4 valves the engine meets the strict emission laws ?
Like i said with the current TDM 900 engine it wil only cost power to meet the emission standard, and were not waiting for new twin with 70 HP. :?

Without looking at the current engine i say, go to 1000 cc, 4 valves (so thay have a litle more room to play with the cilinderheads)
get the power up to around 110/120 hp. and the same(ish) figur torquewise and they have a winner 8)
MT 02 styling is ok with me !

User avatar
cheap_trix
TRX-Enthusiast
Posts: 145
Joined: Sun Apr 02, 2006 10:20 pm
Location: South East QLD. Australia

Post by cheap_trix » Sun Dec 10, 2006 12:06 am

Looks like everybody is getting into mid capacity twins.

Image
The Benelli Due 756

Image
The BMW f800s
Life is pretty straight without twisties.

Triton

Post by Triton » Mon Dec 11, 2006 5:39 am

Priller's Shiver is my choice, not that I'm biased! :lol:

User avatar
Rural Rat
TRX-Enthusiast
Posts: 118
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2007 7:02 am
Location: Adelaide Hills or NSW North Coast

Post by Rural Rat » Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:14 pm

Like others I have been hoping like hell that Yamaha would release an updated TRX with the 900/1000 injected engine and some upgraded suspension.

I have tried the BMW 800S and ST. Nice enough but pretty bland machines. S is certainly a bit more exciting. Then tried KTM Superduke, hey there is a fun machine with enormous character.

User avatar
Quan-Time
Site Sponsor
Posts: 943
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 7:17 am
Location: Riding or swingin a spanner

Post by Quan-Time » Fri Mar 16, 2007 9:12 am

theres a few reasons yamaha is sitting still with "twin" engine development.

Ill summarise a fair few reasons.

1: to develop a 4v head cost money and time. Also the trx doesnt like con configuration of it.. its actually a mechanical thing.

2: the twin isnt really a huge seller. They want bulk sales.. If its a smaller market, there will only be a smaller change to the line up of products. the YZF range is the biggest sellers, thus the most attention to devolpment.

4: emissions is one thing, but theres a few other things to go with it which i wont delve into.. but they can get the power output and still meet standards.

Its possible to make the TRX850 a 996cc configuration. Sure its a fairly heafty change, but it is actually quite possible with the standard block and case.
Obviously injection is easy and 6 speed via the TDM guts. 120hp is quite possible on a production donk if thats how they wanted to go..
Making a new head, cam and crank makes this very possible while using everything else as a bolt in production line operation. (standard valves can be retained from other bikes to make it a touch cheaper.

Another problem is the frame. New swingarm would be needed to handle the power. Im guessing that from a business point of view, they dont want to make a new tooling cast for yet another swingarm, but also dont want to use a R1 swinger (such as i did) as they dont want to steal the thunder from their more "racey" bikes.

Forks would be a no brainer.. some sort of USD from an older model.

Back onto the frame issue. Solid / cast seems to be the way currently,, cheaper for production cos they dont have to pay a welder to make the frame anymore.
They would have to find a new way to house the bike..

Summary,, yes the "new model" trx would be viable, but cutting corners would be the main result.

If they were to release a new "trx" of sorts.. i may not actually purchase it.. Sure im sort of on the market for a new bike.. MT01 is tasty, but so are others.. I like the trx for its imperfections but its character, not for its list of skimps.. thats what defines it..
If a new trx DID evolve, wouldnt it be picked at and all anyone would do is compare it to the old ? thats what im afraid of.. id rather stay with what ive got..
But sure id test one and prolly buy it anyway.
-------------------
I dont have a sig
-------------------

User avatar
devlin
Site Sponsor
Posts: 745
Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2007 7:43 am
Location: Brisbane, Australia

Post by devlin » Fri Apr 13, 2007 3:45 am

Slight grave dig.

In effect they already have the guts of a new model. Why not take the TDM900, fuel injected, 6 speed, perimeter framed set up and increase capacity with better heads. Put a new fairing tank and seat unit on it. Chuck some upside down forks and a late model cast swingarm and voila TRX950 ish. But the question is will they sell lots and lots of them. In the real world like has been said, they are a great bike. Who braggs to there mates about only having 100hp to their mates IL4's 140hp? The way bikes are marketed and the way guys love to have one-up on the next guy means they will be hard to sell in the same numbers as the IL4's. Pity. I am starting to seriously look at tricking a TDM to the above spec. even though I have had my bike for two weeks I can see the real world pluses of the design.
"Racing is life, everything else is just waiting" - Steve McQueen
Four wheels move the body, two wheels move the soul.

Post Reply