Assuming approx 10% loss from crank to rear wheel, then 72 ish bhp is about right (and up from the standard 76 at crank as stock) and broadly comporable to the 80bhp you woudl see, and people quote at the crank wit similar modstrixy7 wrote:I had mine done Dec 09 and it was done on dynojet machine and figures are 71.86 hp ATW only mods are K&N, D&D pipes and carbs jetted 65ks on the clock, dont know how this compares but it sounds good to me without any fibs?
DYNO Result
Moderators: trixynut, Mincehead, dicky, phuk72, Jak, Kevtrx849
- phuk72
- Site Sponsor / Administrator
- Posts: 3522
- Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 1:47 pm
Re: DYNO Result
-
- TRX-Enthusiast
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Sat Sep 04, 2010 10:39 am
Re: DYNO Result
I thought it was about 15% loss from the crank to the rear wheel?
- Mincehead
- TRX-Enthusiast
- Posts: 6345
- Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2009 1:40 pm
- Location: West Sussex
- Contact:
Re: DYNO Result
It varies, there`s no `fixed` percentage, shall we compromise and say 10 to 15%?
LOUD PIPES SAVE LIVES
- Quan-Time
- Site Sponsor
- Posts: 943
- Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 7:17 am
- Location: Riding or swingin a spanner
Re: DYNO Result
Id say just go with 100hp ! who cares if its wrong, you basically have one of the top NA (normally aspirated) TRX's in the world. Somethin to boast about.
Realistically, yes its possible, on standard fuel, id say no.. Would need something like methanol or nitro to get really high..
Realistically, yes its possible, on standard fuel, id say no.. Would need something like methanol or nitro to get really high..
-------------------
I dont have a sig
-------------------
I dont have a sig
-------------------