DYNO Result

Moderators: trixynut, Mincehead, dicky, phuk72, Jak, Kevtrx849

User avatar
phuk72
Site Sponsor / Administrator
Posts: 3522
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 1:47 pm

Re: DYNO Result

Post by phuk72 » Wed Sep 08, 2010 1:59 pm

trixy7 wrote:I had mine done Dec 09 and it was done on dynojet machine and figures are 71.86 hp ATW only mods are K&N, D&D pipes and carbs jetted 65ks on the clock, dont know how this compares but it sounds good to me without any fibs? :D
Assuming approx 10% loss from crank to rear wheel, then 72 ish bhp is about right (and up from the standard 76 at crank as stock) and broadly comporable to the 80bhp you woudl see, and people quote at the crank wit similar mods
Image

trixy7
TRX-Enthusiast
Posts: 7
Joined: Sat Sep 04, 2010 10:39 am

Re: DYNO Result

Post by trixy7 » Wed Sep 08, 2010 10:47 pm

I thought it was about 15% loss from the crank to the rear wheel?

User avatar
Mincehead
TRX-Enthusiast
Posts: 6345
Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2009 1:40 pm
Location: West Sussex
Contact:

Re: DYNO Result

Post by Mincehead » Thu Sep 09, 2010 7:57 am

It varies, there`s no `fixed` percentage, shall we compromise and say 10 to 15%? :wink:
LOUD PIPES SAVE LIVES

User avatar
Quan-Time
Site Sponsor
Posts: 943
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 7:17 am
Location: Riding or swingin a spanner

Re: DYNO Result

Post by Quan-Time » Sat Oct 16, 2010 11:06 am

Id say just go with 100hp ! who cares if its wrong, you basically have one of the top NA (normally aspirated) TRX's in the world. Somethin to boast about.

Realistically, yes its possible, on standard fuel, id say no.. Would need something like methanol or nitro to get really high..
-------------------
I dont have a sig
-------------------

Post Reply