Page 1 of 2

ss valves bigger?

Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2007 4:04 pm
by kookimonsta
does anyone know if stainless valves are about for the trx? slightly bigger or 3 angled or both?

Re: ss valves bigger?

Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2007 4:28 pm
by Killerwhale
kookimonsta wrote:does anyone know if stainless valves are about for the trx? slightly bigger or 3 angled or both?
Only thing i´ve seen is titanium valves for XTZ750....cost a fortune used!

Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2007 6:51 pm
by kookimonsta
any ideas where these are avaliable from? sounds interesting, were they a direct replacement or bigger?

tom

Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2007 6:53 pm
by slow codger
:D What about bits for the xtz850 desert monster, If you could get anything that is?

Dave E

Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2007 7:08 pm
by Killerwhale
kookimonsta wrote:any ideas where these are avaliable from? sounds interesting, were they a direct replacement or bigger?

tom
Don´t know if bigger....would last longer anyhow! :)
Saw them on ebay over a year ago....

Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2007 8:28 pm
by cheesie
its normaly the valve seats that get the three angle or five or radius

Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2007 10:14 pm
by kookimonsta
cheesie wrote:its normaly the valve seats that get the three angle or five or radius
thankyou i didnt know that! i assume its to get the best contact "seal" between the valve and head.

i thought the valve was machined rather then the seat.

cheers tom

Posted: Fri Dec 14, 2007 2:12 pm
by Quan-Time
once valves are machined to the size you want, (angles, back cut, stem collar etc) they are "lapped" into the seat. You do this manually, it gets the best seal.

As for buying new valves, you can buy new stainless ones, they are a touch oversize. If you have access to a lathe, you can cut em down and put on the correct valve angles. If you go to most any specialist "head porter" they can do it all for you.. Replace your seats, make new valves and lap them all in, new retaining collars and springs. It is inherently expensive tho.

$2000 AUD is not unheard of for a 4cyl head (thats with a minor port clean, not a full port job, a "full" job can cost you $5000 depending how far you want to go.. it takes time to find the "best" flow for a head).
If its a common head, such as a V6 buick engine, they quite often have "exchange" programs.. $1000 exchange for a pair of heads (well here in some places in australia anyway). Since the TRX is a bit exotic, dont expect that ! Standard valves are actually very good quality imo.. I cleaned a set up on a wire buff (brass type, so it didnt damage anything) and they came up great, and the stock flow isnt that bad at all. Could use a back angle tho to help stop surge, but otherwise quite well designed.

Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2007 1:56 pm
by dfh
Quan-Time wrote: Standard valves are actually very good quality imo.. I cleaned a set up on a wire buff (brass type, so it didnt damage anything) and they came up great, and the stock flow isnt that bad at all. Could use a back angle tho to help stop surge, but otherwise quite well designed.
Except the '95/'96 inlets elongate stems... result: excessive oil consumption, impossible to shim for clearance, loss of compression, difficult starting, slanderous rumours of valve seat recession.

Cure... post '97 inlets.. different part number. These are well designed and cure all of the above. Made my TRX like new again :D

DFH

Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 6:23 pm
by HansJ
Killerwhale wrote:
kookimonsta wrote:any ideas where these are avaliable from? sounds interesting, were they a direct replacement or bigger?

tom
Don´t know if bigger....would last longer anyhow! :)
Saw them on ebay over a year ago....
Not so sure about that... But as they're lighter, one can rev higher (as long as the crank and con-rods etc are up to it...)

Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 8:45 pm
by cheesie
how far is safe to rev it to as mine now pulls 9000 rpm without any show of reduction in power

Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 8:53 pm
by Killerwhale
cheesie wrote:how far is safe to rev it to as mine now pulls 9000 rpm without any show of reduction in power
Well, 9500 is the limiter so rev on!! ....or do the CDI mod and get 10k....

Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 8:58 pm
by kookimonsta
wasnt really saying bigger valves would last longer or rev higher, just get the gasses in and out faster, something ive always been told about tuning 4 strokes theres no point putting a big bore and bigger carbs etc if you can't get the gasses in and out faster. trx might be fully capable at the mo my thoughts really being that it started off as a 750 back in the day.

Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 11:40 pm
by HansJ
cheesie wrote:how far is safe to rev it to as mine now pulls 9000 rpm without any show of reduction in power
no worries with the low revving TRX engine. If You've had Your bike on a dyno, You'd probably change gears a lot earlier though, unless you have really really hot cams. That's the main reason for titanium valves,reducing the mass of the valves so they still follow the cam profile when the speeds increase. But of course more high revving causes more wear ultimately, but to what extent is hard to say. I know some bikes that have touched the rev limiter a touch to often, and I am not interested in buying them...

Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 11:47 pm
by HansJ
kookimonsta wrote:wasnt really saying bigger valves would last longer or rev higher, just get the gasses in and out faster, something ive always been told about tuning 4 strokes theres no point putting a big bore and bigger carbs etc if you can't get the gasses in and out faster. trx might be fully capable at the mo my thoughts really being that it started off as a 750 back in the day.
:wink: my thoughts exactly, but 'my' tuner had a look at the valves today, and figured the total inlet area looks to be sufficient. He'd do some calcualtions and thinking, I'll let You know the outcome. I don't know if TRX engines have the same valve sizes as the XTZ though, that would definitely be interesting to know.